Asking the right question is the biggest part of getting the right answer. The question the government is asking is “How do we keep the financial sector failures from creating an economic catastrophe?” Answering this question does nothing to keep it from happening again. It is curative and reactive when we need something preventative and proactive.
The right question – “How do we keep from getting into this mess in the future?” (How could we have avoided it in the first place?).
Over the last 30 years, I’ve been involved in managing companies with revenues from $100,000 per year to $100 million per year. And in every case we took great care to avoid putting the security and stability of the company at risk. One of the easiest ways to put a company at risk is to allow one or a small group of clients to become too big a percentage of the company’s revenue. If you lose one or two, the company is put at great risk of collapsing.
This is a fundamental business principle that our government has ignored. We should never have encouraged or allowed a small group of mega-companies to control so much of our economy that going away jeopardizes the security and stability of our nation.
Monopoly laws protect individuals from a few companies taking control of choice, driving up prices, and driving down customer service. If we need any regulations at all, we need one that would ensure no small group of giant corporations could take control of our economy and jeopardize the security and stability of our nation again. It’s just bad business. One possible solution - If a company is big enough that the government has to bail it out for the security and stability of the nation, it’s too big. Revise the monopoly laws to break it up, and we won’t have this problem in the future.
One of the functions of government is to provide security. It has failed us miserably in this case. Instead of preventing economic cancer by following basic business principles, they encouraged economically bloated lifestyles in mega-corporations that were a recipe for disaster. So now we’re spending our time, money, and energy trying to cure something that a good business would have never let happen in the first place.
This band-aid will do nothing to prevent it happening again. Will the government ask the right question? How do we keep a few companies from ever threatening the future security and stability of our nation again? It is the business of government to answer this question. Otherwise the present band-aid will only cover up a wound that will not heal.
9 Comments
This article was posted in Uncategorized on October 1st, 2008
Chuck,
This idea sounds just crazy enough to possibly work, so naturally it won’t be given serious consideration. How great is our bureaucracy!!
I’m against the $85,000,000,000.00 bailout of AIG.
Instead, I’m in favor of giving $85,000,000,000 to America in a We Deserve It Dividend.
To make the math simple, let’s assume there are 200,000,000 bona fide U.S. Citizens 18+.
Our population is about 301,000,000 +/- counting every man, woman and child. So 200,000,000 might be a fair stab at adults 18 and up..
So divide 200 million adults 18+ into $85 billion that equals $425,000.00.
My plan is to give $425,000 to every person 18+ as a We Deserve It Dividend.
Of course, it would NOT be tax free.
So let’s assume a tax rate of 30%.
Every individual 18+ has to pay $127,500.00 in taxes.
That sends $25,500,000,000 right back to Uncle Sam.
But it means that every adult 18+ has $297,500.00 in their pocket.
A husband and wife has $595,000.00.
What would you do with $297,500.00 to $595,000.00 in your family?
Pay off your mortgage - housing crisis solved.
Repay college loans - what a great boost to new grads
Put away money for college - it’ll be there
Save in a bank - create money to loan to entrepreneurs.
Buy a new car - create jobs
Invest in the market - capital drives growth
Pay for your parent’s medical insurance - health care improves
Enable Deadbeat Dads to come clean - or else
Remember this is for every adult U S Citizen 18+ including the folks who lost their jobs at Lehman Brothers and every other company that is cutting back. And of course, for those serving in our Armed Forces.
If we’re going to re-distribute wealth let’s really do it…instead of trickling out a puny $1000.00 ( ‘vote buy’ ) economic incentive that is being proposed
by one of our candidates for President.
If we’re going to do an $85 billion bailout, let’s bail out every adult U S Citizen 18+!
As for AIG - liquidate it.
Sell off its parts.
Let American General go back to being American General.
Sell off the real estate.
Let the private sector bargain hunters cut it up and clean it up.
Here’s my rationale. We deserve it and AIG doesn’t.
Sure it’s a crazy idea that can ‘never work.’
But can you imagine the Coast-To-Coast Block Party!
How do you spell Economic Boom?
I trust my fellow adult Americans to know how to use the $85 Billion
We Deserve It Dividend more than I do the geniuses at AIG or in Washington DC
And remember, This plan only really costs $59.5 Billion because $25.5 Billion is returned instantly in taxes to Uncle Sam.
A very sobering thought on how to best use $85 Billion!!
I personally don’t like the bailout plan- but it is the best we have right now- and timing is critical. I am expecting our congress people to update the regulations in their new session- ASAP- this needs to be priority #1- and everyone should contact their Senators/Representatives- and demand action- that is the only way to prevent this crisis from happening again. The problem- the regulations were enacted in 1934- and Congress has repeatedly declined the opportunity to update them over the years. The regulations are what allowed this mess to occur.
As for the bailout- I think it should be approved- and reworked later- I am not in favor of bailing out all of the companies- but we need to free up credit- to keep our economy and the rest of the world- moving forward. I hope the compensation plans for these Sr. Executives will be non-existant. Just because the regulations allowed them to handle money in this fashion- doesn’t mean they were obliged to do it. If they were not smart enough, to better manage their companies and their organizations- they don’t deserve to be compensated- especially at the expense of the American Taxpaer.
I urge All Americans- to educate yourself- understand how this crisis occured- and work with your Congress people to create new regulations- to allow the US to efficiently and profitably operate in this global economy. The information is available- research the internet, talk to people- and educate yourself! This is your country- and your responsiblity for holding your Congress people accountable.
Janet,
I agree we have no choice but to go through with the rescue. We’ve got cancer - we can’t ignore it.
But as with business, it is much less expensive to prevent disease than to treat it. Let’s get some prevention measures in place and ensure no company will ever need rescued again to keep our nation secure and stable.
To date, I’ve not hear a single politician so much as mention doing anything that will help us avoid this in the future. If they were offering that as part of the rescue, it would be easier for people to get on board.
As a financial expert from being an accountant, financial advisor, and a mortgage planner the bill needs to pass to provide liquidity to the markets. When I was in accounting the only statement that mattered to me was a company’s cash flow statement. I could care less about the income statement. Cash is KING. It takes cash to run a business or a household.
As a strong conservative I HATE having to see the government do this; but it has to do this.
I started blogging on this subject this week and will continue to blog on it for at least another week. Thus far I have come up with 21 reasons and 5 different parties at fault for this Mortgage Mess.
To learn more please visit my blog at http://www.3MortgageSecrets.com.
An associate of mine had heard that the bail-out bill was full of pork barrel funding including helping Alaskan fishermen who suffered from the Exxon Valdez oil leak from nearly 20 years ago. That doesn’t sound right to address current issues. I vote for Mike’s plan above!
Jeane Dole says:
I am fundamentally against this bailout solution but I am sure some form of bailout will take place. I do appreciate that it is taking some time to put the right plan together but even that is beginning to be questionable. The senate bill contains extensive pork for items that have nothing to do with the current financial crisis (it has gone from something like 20 pages to over 400 pages). I am concerned that the majority party people in Congress who are leading the charge on the bailout, are the very people sho put pressure on lenders to make questionable loans. I am also concerned that once this bill is in place, Congress will not give back this part of the economy to the private sector . . . and I don’t think large government does anything particularly well. Check out this website for some of the bill’s particulars.
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/01/read-the-senate-bailout-bill-here/
Not to rain on Mike’s parade, but the math isn’t exactly correct… it would only be $425 per American.
Snopes found the email that was circulating with that exact information– check out what they have to say:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/dividend.asp
I also found out that the math was wrong and the amount would only be $425 per American. Sure sounded good at first!
Chuck,
I do not think anyone has yet identified what is really wrong with the economy (root cause) any ideas?
Rich Gottbreht
Rich,
You’d get as many answers to that as people have belly buttons.
I’m no economist, but some of this is likely cyclical and (in my opinion) a lot of it is emotional and manufactured by overstatements in the news.
The old adage “If it bleeds, it leads” applies to the economy as well. Making dire statements for months on end (we’ve been hearing the word recession for over a year even though we weren’t in one) creates concern, and concern leads to playing it safe.
So some of it may happen as a cycle and the rest of it is a reaction to reality. I for one have decided that if they throw a recession, I will refuse to participate. There are ways to actually thrive during a recession; I’m encouraging my customers to go that route instead.

My name is Chuck Blakeman and these are some of my thoughts on business, growth, and success. My company, TeamNimbusWest, provides outcome-based peer advisory, coaching, and consulting for Business Owners, CEOs, and their growing businesses.
Stay up-to-date. If you like the information in our posts and would to know more about what we’re up to, drop us your e-mail address and we’ll keep in touch.
Why Social Networking (locally and digitally) Can Be a Bad Idea.
Why Your Marketing Doesn’t Work; Features vs. Outcomes – Reason #2 of 7
The Financial Sector Rescue Plan is Answering the Wrong Question
Random Hope is not a Marketing Strategy: Why Our Marketing Doesn't Work - Reason #6 of 7